mirror of
				https://github.com/eledio-devices/thirdparty-littlefs.git
				synced 2025-10-31 00:32:38 +01:00 
			
		
		
		
	Changed block_cycles disable from 0 to -1
As it is now, block_cycles = 0 disables wear leveling. This was a mistake as 0 is the "default" value for several other config options. It's even worse when migrating from v1 as it's easy to miss the addition of block_cycles and end up with a filesystem that is not actually wear-leveling. Clearly, block_cycles = 0 should do anything but disable wear-leveling. Here, I've changed block_cycles = 0 to assert. Forcing users to set a value for block_cycles (500 is suggested). block_cycles can be set to -1 to explicitly disable wear leveling if desired.
This commit is contained in:
		
							
								
								
									
										9
									
								
								lfs.h
									
									
									
									
									
								
							
							
						
						
									
										9
									
								
								lfs.h
									
									
									
									
									
								
							| @@ -190,9 +190,12 @@ struct lfs_config { | ||||
|     // Number of erasable blocks on the device. | ||||
|     lfs_size_t block_count; | ||||
|  | ||||
|     // Number of erase cycles before we should move data to another block. | ||||
|     // May be zero, in which case no block-level wear-leveling is performed. | ||||
|     uint32_t block_cycles; | ||||
|     // Number of erase cycles before we should move logs to another block. | ||||
|     // Suggested values are in the range 100-1000, with large values having | ||||
|     // better performance at the cost of less consistent wear distribution. | ||||
|     // | ||||
|     // Set to -1 to disable block-level wear-leveling. | ||||
|     int32_t block_cycles; | ||||
|  | ||||
|     // Size of block caches. Each cache buffers a portion of a block in RAM. | ||||
|     // The littlefs needs a read cache, a program cache, and one additional | ||||
|   | ||||
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user