github-mirrors/thirdparty-littlefs
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/eledio-devices/thirdparty-littlefs.git synced 2025-10-31 08:42:40 +01:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Added/fixed tests for noop writes (where bd error can't be trusted)

Browse Source 
It's interesting how many ways block devices can show failed writes:
1. prog can error
2. erase can error
3. read can error after writing (ECC failure)
4. prog doesn't error but doesn't write the data correctly
5. erase doesn't error but doesn't erase correctly

Can read fail without an error? Yes, though this appears the same as
prog and erase failing.

These weren't all simulated by testbd since I unintentionally assumed
the block device could always error. Fixed by added additional bad-black
behaviors to testbd.

Note: This also includes a small fix where we can miss bad writes if the
underlying block device contains a valid commit with the exact same
size in the exact same offset.
This commit is contained in:
Christopher Haster
2020-01-29 17:50:38 -06:00
parent 517d3414c5
commit 77e3078b9f
6 changed files with 80 additions and 188 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

34
tests/test_exhaustion.toml
View File

@@ -1,11 +1,13 @@
[[case]] # test running a filesystem to exhaustion
define.LFS_ERASE_CYCLES = 10
define.LFS_BLOCK_COUNT = 256 # small bd so it runs faster
define.LFS_BLOCK_COUNT = 256 # small bd so test runs faster
define.LFS_BLOCK_CYCLES = 'LFS_ERASE_CYCLES / 2'
define.LFS_BADBLOCK_BEHAVIOR = [
'LFS_TESTBD_BADBLOCK_NOPROG',
'LFS_TESTBD_BADBLOCK_NOERASE',
'LFS_TESTBD_BADBLOCK_NOREAD',
'LFS_TESTBD_BADBLOCK_PROGERROR',
'LFS_TESTBD_BADBLOCK_ERASEERROR',
'LFS_TESTBD_BADBLOCK_READERROR',
'LFS_TESTBD_BADBLOCK_PROGNOOP',
'LFS_TESTBD_BADBLOCK_ERASENOOP',
]
define.FILES = 10
code = '''
@@ -79,12 +81,14 @@ exhausted:
[[case]] # test running a filesystem to exhaustion
# which also requires expanding superblocks
define.LFS_ERASE_CYCLES = 10
define.LFS_BLOCK_COUNT = 256 # small bd so it runs faster
define.LFS_BLOCK_COUNT = 256 # small bd so test runs faster
define.LFS_BLOCK_CYCLES = 'LFS_ERASE_CYCLES / 2'
define.LFS_BADBLOCK_BEHAVIOR = [
'LFS_TESTBD_BADBLOCK_NOPROG',
'LFS_TESTBD_BADBLOCK_NOERASE',
'LFS_TESTBD_BADBLOCK_NOREAD',
'LFS_TESTBD_BADBLOCK_PROGERROR',
'LFS_TESTBD_BADBLOCK_ERASEERROR',
'LFS_TESTBD_BADBLOCK_READERROR',
'LFS_TESTBD_BADBLOCK_PROGNOOP',
'LFS_TESTBD_BADBLOCK_ERASENOOP',
]
define.FILES = 10
code = '''
@@ -159,13 +163,8 @@ exhausted:
[[case]] # wear-level test running a filesystem to exhaustion
define.LFS_ERASE_CYCLES = 20
define.LFS_BLOCK_COUNT = 256 # small bd so it runs faster
define.LFS_BLOCK_COUNT = 256 # small bd so test runs faster
define.LFS_BLOCK_CYCLES = 'LFS_ERASE_CYCLES / 2'
define.LFS_BADBLOCK_BEHAVIOR = [
'LFS_TESTBD_BADBLOCK_NOPROG',
'LFS_TESTBD_BADBLOCK_NOERASE',
'LFS_TESTBD_BADBLOCK_NOREAD',
]
define.FILES = 10
code = '''
uint32_t run_cycles[2];
@@ -252,13 +251,8 @@ exhausted:
[[case]] # wear-level test + expanding superblock
define.LFS_ERASE_CYCLES = 20
define.LFS_BLOCK_COUNT = 256 # small bd so it runs faster
define.LFS_BLOCK_COUNT = 256 # small bd so test runs faster
define.LFS_BLOCK_CYCLES = 'LFS_ERASE_CYCLES / 2'
define.LFS_BADBLOCK_BEHAVIOR = [
'LFS_TESTBD_BADBLOCK_NOPROG',
'LFS_TESTBD_BADBLOCK_NOERASE',
'LFS_TESTBD_BADBLOCK_NOREAD',
]
define.FILES = 10
code = '''
uint32_t run_cycles[2];