The optional config structure options up the possibility of adding
file-level configuration in a backwards compatible manner.
Also adds possibility to open multiple files with LFS_NO_MALLOC
enabled thanks to dpgeorge
Also bumped minor version to v1.5
Before this, littlefs incorrectly assumed corrupt blocks were only the result
of our own modification. This would be fine for most cases of freshly
erased storage, but for storage with block-level ECC this wasn't always
true.
Fortunately, it's quite easy for littlefs to handle this case correctly,
as long as corrupt storage always reports that it is corrupt, which for
most forms of ECC is the case unless we perform a write on the storage.
found by rojer
When using "%d" or "%x" with uint32_t types, arm-none-eabi-gcc reports
warnings like below:
-- >8 -- >8 -- >8 -- >8 -- >8 -- >8 --
In file included from lfs.c:8:
lfs_util.h:45:12: warning: format '%d' expects argument of type 'int', but argument 4 has type 'lfs_block_t' {aka 'long unsigned int'} [-Wformat=]
printf("lfs debug:%d: " fmt "\n", __LINE__, __VA_ARGS__)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
lfs.c:2512:21: note: in expansion of macro 'LFS_DEBUG'
LFS_DEBUG("Found partial move %d %d",
^~~~~~~~~
lfs.c:2512:55: note: format string is defined here
LFS_DEBUG("Found partial move %d %d",
~^
%ld
-- >8 -- >8 -- >8 -- >8 -- >8 -- >8 --
Fix this by replacing "%d" and "%x" with `"%" PRIu32` and `"%" PRIx32`.
As a shortcut, littlefs never bother to zero any of the buffers is used.
It didn't need to because it would always write out the entirety of the
data it needed.
Unfortunately, this, combined with the extra padding used to align
buffers to the nearest prog size, would lead to uninitialized data
getting written out to disk.
This means unrelated file data could be written to different parts of
storage, or worse, information leaked from the malloc calls could be
written out to disk unnecessarily.
found by rojer
