Before, the tag format's type field was limited to 9-bits. This sounds
like a lot, but this field needed to encode up to 256 user-specified
types. This limited the flexibility of the encoded types. As time went
on, more bits in the type field were repurposed for various things,
leaving a rather fragile type field.
Here we make the jump to full 11-bit type fields. This comes at the cost
of a smaller length field, however the use of the length field was
always going to come with a RAM limitation. Rather than putting pressure
on RAM for inline files, the new type field lets us encode a chunk
number, splitting up inline files into multiple updatable units. This
actually pushes the theoretical inline max from 8KiB to 256KiB! (Note
that we only allow a single 1KiB chunk for now, chunky inline files
is just a theoretical future improvement).
Here is the new 32-bit tag format, note that there are multiple levels
of types which break down into more info:
[---- 32 ----]
[1|-- 11 --|-- 10 --|-- 10 --]
^. ^ . ^ ^- entry length
|. | . \------------ file id chunk info
|. \-----.------------------ type info (type3)
\.-----------.------------------ valid bit
[-3-|-- 8 --]
^ ^- chunk info
\------- type info (type1)
Additionally, I've split the CREATE tag into separate SPLICE and NAME
tags. This simplified the new compact logic a bit. For now, littlefs
still follows the rule that a NAME tag precedes any other tags related
to a file, but this can change in the future.
While ECORRUPT is not a wrong error code, it doesn't match other
instances of hitting a corrupt block during write. During writes, if
blocks are detected as corrupt their data is evicted and moved to a new
clean block. This means that at the end of a disk's lifetime, exhaustion
errors will be reported as ENOSPC when littlefs can't find any new block
to store the data.
This has the benefit of matching behaviour when a new file is written
and no more blocks can be found, due to either a small disk or corrupted
blocks on disk. To littlefs it's like the disk shrinks in size over
time.
Expanding superblocks has been on my wishlist for a while. The basic
idea is that instead of maintaining a fixed offset blocks {0, 1} to the
the root directory (1 pointer), we maintain a dynamically sized
linked-list of superblocks that point to the actual root. If the number
of writes to the root exceeds some value, we increase the size of the
superblock linked-list.
This can leverage existing metadata-pair operations. The revision count for
metadata-pairs provides some knowledge on how much wear we've put on the
superblock, and the threaded linked-list can also be reused for this
purpose. This means superblock expansion is both optional and cheap to
implement.
Expanding superblocks helps both extremely small and extremely large filesystem
(extreme being relative of course). On the small end, we can actually
collapse the superblock into the root directory and drop the hard requirement
of 4-blocks for the superblock. On the large end, our superblock will
now last longer than the rest of the filesystem. Each time we expand,
the number of cycles until the superblock dies is increased by a power.
Before we were stuck with this layout:
level cycles limit layout
1 E^2 390 MiB s0 -> root
Now we expand every time a fixed offset is exceeded:
level cycles limit layout
0 E 4 KiB s0+root
1 E^2 390 MiB s0 -> root
2 E^3 37 TiB s0 -> s1 -> root
3 E^4 3.6 EiB s0 -> s1 -> s2 -> root
...
Where the cycles are the number of cycles before death, and the limit is
the worst-case size a filesystem where early superblock death becomes a
concern (all writes to root using this formula: E^|s| = E*B, E = erase
cycles = 100000, B = block count, assuming 4096 byte blocks).
Note we can also store copies of the superblock entry on the expanded
superblocks. This may help filesystem recover tools in the future.
Making the superblock look like "just another entry" allows us to treat
the superblock like "just another entry" and reuse a decent amount of
logic that would otherwise only be used a format and mount time. In this
case we can use append to write out the superblock like it was creating
a new entry on the filesystem.
This provides a limited form of wear leveling. While wear is
not actually balanced across blocks, the filesystem can recover
from corrupted blocks and extend the lifetime of a device nearly
as much as dynamic wear leveling.
For use-cases where wear is important, it would be better to use
a full form of dynamic wear-leveling at the block level. (or
consider a logging filesystem).
Corrupted block handling was simply added on top of the existing
logic in place for the filesystem, so it's a bit more noodly than
it may have to be, but it gets the work done.
Before, the lfs had multiple paths to determine config options:
- lfs_config struct passed during initialization
- lfs_bd_info struct passed during block device initialization
- compile time options
This allowed different developers to provide their own needs
to the filesystem, such as the block device capabilities and
the higher level user's own tweaks.
However, this comes with additional complexity and action required
when the configurations are incompatible.
For now, this has been reduced to all information (including block
device function pointers) being passed through the lfs_config struct.
We just defer more complicated handling of configuration options to
the top level user.
This simplifies configuration handling and gives the top level user
the responsibility to handle configuration, which they probably would
have wanted to do anyways.
After quite a bit of prototyping, settled on the following functions:
- lfs_dir_alloc - create a new dir
- lfs_dir_fetch - load and check a dir pair from disk
- lfs_dir_commit - save a dir pair to disk
- lfs_dir_shift - shrink a dir pair to disk
- lfs_dir_append - add a dir entry, creating dirs if needed
- lfs_dir_remove - remove a dir entry, dropping dirs if needed
Additionally, followed through with a few other tweaks
