This was a pretty simple oversight on my part. Conceptually, there's no
difference between lfs_fs_getattr and lfs_getattr("/"). Any operations
on directories can be applied "globally" by referring to the root
directory.
Implementation wise, this actually fixes the "corner case" of storing
attributes on the root directory, which is broken since the root
directory doesn't have a related entry. Instead we need to use the root
superblock for this purpose.
Fewer functions means less code to document and maintain, so this is a
nice benefit. Now we just have a single lfs_getattr/setattr/removeattr set
of functions along with the ability to access attributes atomically in
lfs_file_opencfg.
This implements the second step of full dynamic wear-leveling, block
allocation randomization. This is the key part the uniformly distributes
wear across the filesystem, even through reboots.
The entropy actually comes from the filesystem itself, by xoring
together all of the CRCs in the metadata-pairs on the filesystem. While
this sounds like a ridiculous operation, it's easy to do when we already
scan the metadata-pairs at mount time.
This gives us a random number we can use for block allocation.
Unfortunately it's not a great general purpose random generator as the
output only changes every filesystem write. Fortunately that's exactly
when we need our allocator.
---
Additionally, the randomization created a mess for the testing
framework. Fortunately, this method of randomization is deterministic.
A very useful property for reproducing bugs.
