Moslty just a hole in testing. Dir blocks were not being
correctly collected when removing entries from very large
files due to forgetting about the tail-bit in the directory
block size. The test hole has now been filled.
Also added lfs_entry_size to avoid having to repeat that
expression since it is a bit ridiculous
This provides a limited form of wear leveling. While wear is
not actually balanced across blocks, the filesystem can recover
from corrupted blocks and extend the lifetime of a device nearly
as much as dynamic wear leveling.
For use-cases where wear is important, it would be better to use
a full form of dynamic wear-leveling at the block level. (or
consider a logging filesystem).
Corrupted block handling was simply added on top of the existing
logic in place for the filesystem, so it's a bit more noodly than
it may have to be, but it gets the work done.
Before, the lfs had multiple paths to determine config options:
- lfs_config struct passed during initialization
- lfs_bd_info struct passed during block device initialization
- compile time options
This allowed different developers to provide their own needs
to the filesystem, such as the block device capabilities and
the higher level user's own tweaks.
However, this comes with additional complexity and action required
when the configurations are incompatible.
For now, this has been reduced to all information (including block
device function pointers) being passed through the lfs_config struct.
We just defer more complicated handling of configuration options to
the top level user.
This simplifies configuration handling and gives the top level user
the responsibility to handle configuration, which they probably would
have wanted to do anyways.
Unfortunately, threading all dir blocks in a linked-list did
not come without problems.
While it's possible to atomically add a dir to the linked list
(by adding the new dir into the linked-list position immediately
after it's parent, requiring only one atomic update to the parent
block), it is not easy to make sure the linked-list is in a state
that always allows atomic removal of dirs.
The simple solution is to allow this non-atomic removal, with an
additional step to remove any orphans that could have been created
by a power-loss. This deorphan step is only run if the normal
allocator has failed.
In writing the initial allocator, I ran into the rather
difficult problem of trying to iterate through the entire
filesystem cheaply and with only constant memory consumption
(which prohibits recursive functions).
The solution was to simply thread all directory blocks onto a
massive linked-list that spans the entire filesystem.
With the linked-list it was easy to create a traverse function
for all blocks in use on the filesystem (which has potential
for other utility), and add the rudimentary block allocator
using a bit-vector.
While the linked-list may add complexity (especially where
needing to maintain atomic operations), the linked-list helps
simplify what is currently the most expensive operation in
the filesystem, with no cost to space (the linked-list can
reuse the pointers used for chained directory blocks).
All path iteration all goes through the lfs_dir_find function,
which manages the syntax of paths and updates the path pointer
to just the name stored in the dir entry.
Also added directory chaining, which allows more than one block
per directory. This is a simple linked list.
