There are two issues, when using the file-based block device emulation
on Windows Platforms:
1. There is no fsync implementation available. This needs to be mapped
to a Windows-specific FlushFileBuffers system call.
2. The block device file needs to be opened as binary file (O_BINARY)
The corresponding flag is not required for Linux.
- nit: Moving brace to end of if statement line for consistency
- mount: add more debug info per CR
- Fix compiler error from extra parentheses
- Fix superblock typo
The basic idea is simple, if we seek to a position in the currently
loaded cache, don't flush the cache. Notably this ensures that seek is
always as fast or faster than just reading the data.
This is a bit tricky since we need to check that our new block and
offset match the cache, fortunately we can skip the block check by
reevaluating the block index for both the current and new positions.
Note this only works whene reading, for writing we need to always flush
the cache, or else we will lose the pending write data.
Interestingly this was introduced by two different PRs which were not tested
together until pre-release testing:
- Fix lfs_file_seek doesn't update cache properties correctly
- Fix compiler warnings when LFS_READONLY defined
BUG CASE:Assume there are 6 blocks in littlefs, block 0,1,2,3 already allocated. 0 has a tail pair of {2, 3}. Now we try to write more into 0.
When writing to block 0, we will split(FIRST SPLIT), thus allocate block 4 and 5. Up to now , everything is as expected.
Then we will try to commit in block 4, during which split(SECOND SPLIT) is triggered again(In our case, some files are large, some are small, one split may not be enough). Still as expected now.
BUG happens when we try to alloc a new block pair for the second split:
As lookahead buffer reaches the end , a new lookahead buffer will be generated from flash content, and block 4, 5 are unused blocks in the new lookahead buffer because they are not programed yet. HOWEVER, block 4,5 should be occupied in the first split!!!!! The result is block 4,5 are allocated again(This is where things are getting wrong).
commit ce2c01f results in this bug. In the commit, a lfs_alloc_ack is inserted in lfs_dir_split, which will cause split to reset lfs->free.ack to block count.
In summary, this problem exists after 2.1.3.
Solution: don't call lfs_alloc_ack in lfs_dir_split.
When the on-disk block size doesn't match the config block size, it is
possible to get file corruption. For instance, if the num blocks was
0x200 and we re-mount with 0x100 files could be corrupt.
If we re-mount with a larger number of blocks things should be safer,
but could be handled with a resize option or perhaps a mount flag to
ignore this parameter.
I confirmed that the same number of tests are run
with "make test" on:
* Ubuntu with and without this change
* macOS with this change
> ====== results ======
> tests passed 817/817 (100.00%)
> tests failed 0/817 (0.00%)
This is useful for testing the new erroring assert behavior in CI.
Asserts do not error by default, so this macro needs to be overriden.
It is possible to test this behavior using the existing option of
overriding lfs_util.h with a custom file, by using a small sed
one-line script. But this is much simpler.
This does raise the question if more of the configuration options in
lfs_util.h should be opened up for function-like macro overrides.
lfs_mdir_isopen goes unused if asserts are disabled, and this caused an
"unused function" warning on Clang (curiously not on GCC since the
function was static inline, commonly used for header-only functions).
Also removed "inline" from the lfs_mdir_* functions as these involve
linked-list operations and really shouldn't be inlined. And since they
are static, inlining should occur automatically if there is a benefit.
Found by dpgeorge
